Covid-19 has the flu

It is becoming increasingly clear that Covid-19 has the same distribution patterns as influenza. We can learn a lot from this, if we are prepared to take a serious look at the data. Plus, we also know that it will lead to far fewer infections throughout Western Europe and North America in the coming months. (And it may reappear in the autumn).

The large outbreaks above 30 gr North latitude

The major eruptions of Covid-19 between January and mid-April have been in the areas where the flu waves are only in winter.  (Only above 30 degrees North latitude flu waves, only occur in the winter months. South of it we see different patterns. Then it is during rainy seasons). The big flu wave in 2017/2018 in the Netherlands lasted until week 20 (so beginning of May).

This is the overview of the flu in the Netherlands over the past 5 years.

Above 30 gr. NB in China, the annual flu wave is between December and March.   Wuhan is also located in that area.

When comparing the spread pattern of influenza and Covid-19 two points are of great importance to take into account:

  1. In the case of influenza, with every annual variety that flares, a significant proportion of the population is already immune to it, due to comparable variants from the past. This is not the case with Covid-19.
  2. Normally we see the influenza virus in Western Europe and the northern part of the US already at the beginning of the winter. That takes until somewhere between weeks 10 and 15.  The flu wave of 2017-2018 lasted very long (about 16 weeks). Covid-19 only appeared relatively late in the winter (around week 6).  16 weeks added up to week 22 (that week ends at the end of May).

By zooming in on the flu wave of 2017 -2018 and comparing it with the figures we now have for Covid-19, the above can be well illustrated.

In addition to the excess mortality numbers for the flu period 2017-2018, respondents were asked via at the beginning of May 2018, whether they had flu in the past 8 months. Based on the answers, we estimate that this percentage is 25% for people under 65 years of age and 15% for people over 65 years of age.

If we combine these figures with the excess mortality per age group in 2017-2018, you can estimate what the IFR has been during the flu wave that year. The IFR is the percentage of infected people who died from that disease. (Infection Fatality Rate).

We can also do that with the mortality of COVID-19 up to and including week 18 (these are the figures established by CBS). The accountability for the IFR, which we use, can be found here.

And then we see the following:


If we only look at the totals per age group, the similarities are very striking (the last two columns). The IFR per age group for influenza in 2018 and Covid-19 are quite similar. Only if we look at the gender breakdowns, we see that men die more of Covid-19 than women.

Apart from the difference in the way COVID-19 spreads compared to influenza, it is important to realize that in case of influenza in 2017-2018 100% of the cases were counted. Those who did not become ill were apparently immune to that year’s influenza variant(s). With respect to Covid-19 this is certainly not the case now. It is estimated that the percentage infected with Covid-19 until now is somewhere between 10 and 15%. So it is plausible that if Covid-19 could spread indefinitely, the total excess mortality will be a factor of 5 to 10 greater than the approximately 9,000, which have been established up to week 18.


Is Covid-19 going to follow the same pattern as the flu waves?

The central question now is whether Covid-19 will follow the same seasonal patterns as influenza in terms of spread. It seems so, because everywhere above 30 degrees North latitude where Covid-19 has broken out you see it descending sharply, like influenza does. shows that nicely with the following graph.

With these figures it should be taken into account that the death of Covid-19 occurs on average 3 weeks after the infection. So the current state of affairs on the graph shows the number of infections around 25 April (end of week 17).

The sharp decline in the number of deaths in Western Europe and New York since April 15th, which we actually see in this overview, is assumed to be due to the lockdowns that have been applied everywhere in various variants. (Personally, I think I can prove that the most important reason was that meetings with more than a few people were banned everywhere around 15 March, but that is irrelevant in the context of this article).

Influenza no longer spreads in Western Europe after week 18 to 20. Apparently the conditions for the influenza virus are not favorable then. Does that apply to COVID-19 as well?

There are many indications that COVID-19 follows the pattern of influenza in its spread.

I want to show that indirectly through the information about Brazil. This report gives an overview of the Brazilian flu waves. The country is very large. It runs from 5 degrees north latitude to 33 degrees south latitude. This graph from the report shows when the flu waves occur in the different states of the country.

Vertically you see the latitude. Horizontally the week number. The orange line refers to states in Brazil where there is a clear moment in the year when a flu wave starts. The gray line refers to states where there is no clear seasonal pattern. But also there we see that the flu waves in Brazil run between week 14 and 26 (so from mid-March until the end of June).

The upper orange line concerns the Amazon province, where Manaus is located. The flu season starts there in week 17. The flu waves come a bit later in the southern states. Rio de Janeiro is between week 22 and 24 on average. Sao Paulo (in grey) is around week 21.

Because Covid-19 didn’t “meet” any people in the beginning, who were already immune, it’s logical that it spreaded more easily. That happened in Sao Paulo around week 8. Especially rich Brazilians who had been on winter sports in Europe brought the virus into that area.

The outbreak in Manaus started around March 20.  I wrote about it in this blog.

The current developments in Brazil are pretty much in line with the influenza pattern (if you take into account that it can spread more easily than any influenza virus, because nobody is immune to it).


Below I’ve made a graph with the normal flu seasons in 4 countries in the southern hemisphere plus Italy and England. It shows the number of deaths by Covid-19 per 1 million inhabitants. The difference is obvious.

If we look at the top 10 countries in the world with the largest number of deaths by Covid-19 per 1 million inhabitants, those are all countries, like the Netherlands, where the flu wave is in the winter (as can also be seen in the graph in the two lowest countries). The official number of COVID deaths per 1 million inhabitants is (well) above 200 in those 10 countries (in that overview I have excluded very small countries).

The fact that the figures in New Zealand, Australia, Argentina and South-Africa are so much lower than ours, must be related to the fact that in those countries there was no flu season (yet). Therefore the conditions for the COVID virus to spread were significantly worse there than in our country, just like with influenza. Here I explain why.

My conclusion is that in the coming months Covid-19 will follow the patterns of flu worldwide.

(With the note, of course, that because few people in those countries are still immune, this will lead to a higher spread rate if the right measures are not taken.)


The major consequences of this dispersal pattern

I draw the following important conclusions here:

Circumstances to spread again quickly will be (very) unfavorable for COVID-19 until sometime in the autumn. Regardless of what measures we take, the number of people infected will no longer increase significantly. Even if we do almost everything this summer that we were allowed to do before March 1st, it will certainly not see the large numbers of victims that we had at the end of March in the Netherlands.

If in countries below 30 degrees North the COVID-19 virus has not yet completely disappeared, there is a very good chance that when the normal flu season starts there will be major outbreaks.

With regard to the latter, I am very worried because WHO/RIVM are on the wrong assumptions with regard to the way in which one person can infect the other. (Namely through direct contact, completely ignoring the airborne infections through aerosols). This document by the RIVM of May 18th is sad proof of this. I can’t believe my eyes, how they are working towards their desired mantra/final conclusion.

If you don’t have to believe me, read this paper by the Australian professor Lidia Morawska. The title is “Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face reality.” This is her conclusion.


Remember that in India for example, the monsoon period starts at the beginning of June. It starts in the Southwest (Kerala), where it can stay up to 5 months and then moves to the Northeast. In New Delhi it starts in July-August.

As long as the WHO does not recognize how the spread of COVID-19 really takes place, countries will take the wrong measures.

In the Netherlands through the 1.5 meter measures, with disastrous consequences for economy and society. (and also unnecessary health risks in indoor areas)

In countries where the rain season has yet to start, with vastly more COVID-19 victims than needed.

Hopefully WHO and RIVM will return from that road, leading to a disaster much bigger than necessary.

3 antwoorden
  1. Roos
    Roos zegt:

    Dear Maurice,
    Thanks for sharing your analysis with us. As a scientist I feel concerned, just like many other scientists, about the inferences made by national and international policy makers. With regard to the considered nonimmunity I rembered a article of Beda M. Stadler, professor emeritus in epidemiology from Switzerland in which he discusses the misunderstandings about the assumed nonimmunity. He explains (the fairytale of no immunity) of what went wrong in making these assumptions and clarifies why we rather have immunity against Sars-CoV-2, with reference to papers of Cristian Drosten and John P A Ioannidis:
    So, considering an eventual second wave, this would be worthwhile to take into account, together with precautions adressing ventilation. This may contribute to flattening the curve by weaving in a natural occuring phenomenon (i.e. part of the population has immunity), and ventilation precautions as well, thereby limiting the often considered exponential growth (see Michael Levitt from Stanford about assumptions of exponential growth:, while we can turn back to our normal social lives.
    Thanks so much again for sharing your posts with us! Roos

  2. Ted
    Ted zegt:

    Having read Ms Morawska’s article on airborne transmission of Covid-19 ( from beginning to end, I am struck by its clarity and well-documented reasoning.

    She mentions two possible reasons for airborne transmission of Covid-19 not being recognised for its importance by the WHO and national health authorities. One is the difficulty of detection of airborne viruses, the other is the lack of knowledge of microbiologists (I suppose she includes virologists) of building airflow technology. It is clearly shown that the moisture content of small fluid particles exhaled by someone infected by a lung-resident virus will quickly evaporate, leaving the virus floating free in the air. Inside buildings or enclosed spaces the lifespan of a virus-loaded droplet is longer than outside.

    I never understood why one lung-resident virus (Covid-19) will have different transmission properties from another (some strains of influenza A). The RIVM guidance page on influenza (in particular clearly mentions aerosoles as an important transmission route including the role of air humidity etc, as Maurice maintains. Note that some influenza strains will settle in the patient’s lungs rather than in the upper airway, just like Covid-19.

    Finally, I am not an academic, but I received training as a merchant navy officer. We weren’t concerned with scientific research, just with applied science. That doesn’t mean I haven’t learned to use my brains. I wonder if in managing this crisis we haven’t relied too much on virologists, whose scientific research naturally is focused on the long term, instead of short-term decision. If I see a ship appearing out of the fog, I take evasive action, using all my senses. I don’t turn to a doctor first to have my eyes re-certified!


Plaats een Reactie

Draag gerust bij!

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *